Category: news

On June 18, I mentioned the bill that US Senator Orrin Hatch is introducing which would make it illegal to “induce” someone to commit a copyright violation. Here are a couple more links on the subject.

First, Joanna Glasner covers the reaction of the tech industry to the bill in this Wired.com article:

“As we read it, reporters who wrote about peer-to-peer file-trading networks could well be charged with inducing infringement,” he said. “Their definition of inducement seems to cover almost anything.” (Wired.com: “File-Trading Bill Stokes Fury”, June 24, 2004)

In this article, Ernest Miller annotates Hatch’s introduction to the INDUCE Act:

Criminal law defines “inducement” as “that which leads or tempts to the commission of crime.” [Luckily, not every temptation is a crime or there would be more people in jail than free.] Some P2P software appears to be the definition of criminal inducement captured in computer code. [Software is a tool. This is the same as saying that bolt-cutters and crowbars are inducements to burglary.] (The Importance Of: “The Obsessively Annotated Introduction to the INDUCE Act”, June 24, 2004)

Link via BoingBoing.net.

US Senator Orrin Hatch has introduced a bill that would make it illegal (in the US) to make or use devices that are capable of a copyright violation. This would mean that most computers, CD burners, scanners, cameras, and even VCRs would become illegal devices.

Also, the wording of the bill indicates that it would be illegal to “counsel” regarding copyright violation, which effectively muzzles: web links to certain software companies, discussions on CD and DVD protections, or even suggesting to someone that it’s possible to copy a copyrighted work.

Many have speculated that this is an attempt to overturn the “Betamax” ruling, which protects recording for personal use, and that it may be an attempt to control any technology that has the potential to be used illegally.

It’s interesting to note the bill is named “Induce” or “Inducement Devolves into Unlawful Child Exploitation Act”. It’s not clear to many how this relates to child exploitation. More than likely, that’s a way to demonize the bill’s critics — after all, it’s not about boosting the profits of large corporations, it’s about the children. Please, think of the children!!

Now, I appreciate copyright protections. They’re a good thing. But isn’t it a bit extreme to make everyone a criminal for having the potential to break the law? And if this passes, will copyright holders start suing manufacturers (or owners) of VCRs, tape recorders, CD burners, or computers? Even cameras have the potential to violate copyright. Certainly, this would have an effect on the development of new digital technology.

Frankly, I’d be surprised if an insane bill like this actually made it into law, but if it does, expect some interesting court cases. The RIAA’s lawyers must be drooling over this.

Link: CNN: “Antipiracy bill targets technology”

(Link via Slashdot: “Sen. Hatch to Introduce Wide-ranging Copyright Bill”)

Here’s a link to an interesting video clip — Dubya casually reaches over and uses a woman’s sweater to clean his glasses.

Link: Human Kleenex

Does it disturb anyone else that the man has so little respect for people that he’ll basically use them like tissue?

And does anyone find this behaviour the least bit surprising? No, neither do I.

(Link via BoingBoing)