Incommunicado

I lost my cellphone. Maybe I shouldn’t have given up the land-line after all. I mean, I can’t even phone around to see if anyone found it. Doh!!!

Update: tried calling my own number with no answer. Maybe the batteries are dead. So then I called Telus Mobility and suspended the phone. Don’t want any extra long distance charges on the thing.

Well that’s the end of the phone, I guess. Later this weekend I’ll visit the cell phone shop and buy the cheapest replacement possible. Unless of course they have one of those camera phones with web, games, and a QWERTY keyboard. drooooool.

Many thanks to Mike, who lent me his cell phone for the day. Oh, by the way, Mike… Guido called about the Chinese watches. You know. The “Chinese watches”. ;)

Update: Many thanks to my Dad, who met up with the guy who found the phone! My phone and I are now reunited. Yay!

VCRs may become illegal in US

US Senator Orrin Hatch has introduced a bill that would make it illegal (in the US) to make or use devices that are capable of a copyright violation. This would mean that most computers, CD burners, scanners, cameras, and even VCRs would become illegal devices.

Also, the wording of the bill indicates that it would be illegal to “counsel” regarding copyright violation, which effectively muzzles: web links to certain software companies, discussions on CD and DVD protections, or even suggesting to someone that it’s possible to copy a copyrighted work.

Many have speculated that this is an attempt to overturn the “Betamax” ruling, which protects recording for personal use, and that it may be an attempt to control any technology that has the potential to be used illegally.

It’s interesting to note the bill is named “Induce” or “Inducement Devolves into Unlawful Child Exploitation Act”. It’s not clear to many how this relates to child exploitation. More than likely, that’s a way to demonize the bill’s critics — after all, it’s not about boosting the profits of large corporations, it’s about the children. Please, think of the children!!

Now, I appreciate copyright protections. They’re a good thing. But isn’t it a bit extreme to make everyone a criminal for having the potential to break the law? And if this passes, will copyright holders start suing manufacturers (or owners) of VCRs, tape recorders, CD burners, or computers? Even cameras have the potential to violate copyright. Certainly, this would have an effect on the development of new digital technology.

Frankly, I’d be surprised if an insane bill like this actually made it into law, but if it does, expect some interesting court cases. The RIAA’s lawyers must be drooling over this.

Link: CNN: “Antipiracy bill targets technology”

(Link via Slashdot: “Sen. Hatch to Introduce Wide-ranging Copyright Bill”)

On money and anti-money

This post is for tech writers only. All others can glaze over and look bored.

The debate rages. Which of these is correct?

  • anti money laundering
  • anti money-laundering
  • anti-money laundering
  • anti-money-laundering

I like the idea of laundering anti-money, but that doesn’t appear to be the purpose of this company’s software. Opinions, anyone?

Yes, I know what “hot” means

I like spicy foods. I put hot sauce on practically everything — without it, food is bland and boring. Why is it that this surprises people?

Example: I frequent a particular take-out stand for lunch a couple of times a week. I often order some chow mein and some hot-and-sour soup. Every time, the owner hesitates, peers at me, and says, “Very spicy!…OK?”

Example: I was at Subway. I asked for hot sauce on my sub. The “sandwich artist” asked me if I was sure… “It’s very hot.” Yes, I was sure. I like spicy. “Really? You don’t look like you would.” What’s that supposed to mean?

Alright, are these things not called “hot-and-sour soup” and “hot sauce”? Am I so pale and sickly that shop-owners fear for my safety?