In another colossal blunder, BBC claims that the Loch Ness monster or “Nessie” does not exist. An obviously flawed, so-called “scientific” search using sonar beams failed to reveal the evidence that they felt would prove the monster’s existence.
I believe that the BBC is grasping at straws when they try to explain away the existence of a monster as hallucinations, optical illusions, or hoaxes. This new “evidence” only demonstrates that when you set out to prove that something doesn’t exist, you will always succeed. The absence of sonar evidence only proves that Nessie is elusive, which we all knew anyway. Photographs and first-hand witnesses provide enough proof that would stand up even in a US military court of law.
I’m a skeptic myself. I will not believe reports that Nessie doesn’t exist until I see proof. Do you still doubt the existence of aquatic monsters? Maybe you should look at my photographs of the Sea Monster of Howe Sound. I call him Howie.
Where would we be if we doubted everything based on a lack of evidence? These skeptics are the same ones who set out to prove the non-existence of God. But I have photographic evidence of His existence too. He lives under the front steps of the abandoned house across the street, and I’ve seen Him foraging in the alley from time to time. Hold on. No, that’s a raccoon. I’m sorry. I get confused sometimes.